Catapults Under Fire: Government Stands Firm Amid Campaign for Ban

Campaigners against catapult usage have ignited significant discussion after a parliamentary petition surged past 10,000 signatures, calling for a complete ban on the sale and carrying of these devices. The movement, spearheaded by Danni Rogers, a volunteer at Shepperton Swan Sanctuary, was spurred by tragic incidents involving attacks on wildfowl. The petition gained momentum, reaching 18,600 signatures, ultimately prompting an official response from the government.

In their statement, the government expressed sympathy for the concerns raised by the petitioners, particularly regarding the alarming rise in attacks on wildlife involving catapults. However, officials noted the necessity to balance public safety concerns with the rights of lawful users, such as anglers, who utilize catapults for fishing activities. This sentiment has been met with backlash from advocates like Rogers, who dismissed the government’s rationale as merely an excuse to maintain the status quo. He described the response as shocking and reiterated his belief that current laws are insufficient to protect wildlife effectively.

The movement has garnered widespread support throughout the South East, particularly in areas like Kent and Surrey, where reports of assaults on individuals, vehicles, and property have surfaced. According to a government spokesperson, while there are existing laws that empower police to manage offenses involving unnecessary suffering to wildlife, they maintain that the current framework effectively balances the various interests at play.

As the dialogue continues, petitioners remain resolute in their commitment to shine a light on wildlife crime, vowing not to relent until meaningful changes are enacted. Should the petition surpass 100,000 signatures, it may be slated for debate within Parliament, offering a potential avenue for more extensive discussions on the matter.

Samuel wycliffe