'We Are Not Lazy': The Fierce Debate Over Work-from-Home Criticism

The recent remarks by Lord Rose, former head of M&S and Asda, claiming that working from home is ‘not proper work’ has sparked significant backlash from those who believe remote work is essential. In a BBC inquiry, over 350 responses were received, with a majority advocating for working from home due to various reasons, particularly health concerns. Individuals like Alba, who suffers from chronic conditions, articulated their need for a supportive work environment that accommodates their health, asserting that remote work helps them maintain productivity and avoid dependency on benefits.

Clare McNeil from Timewise emphasized the benefits of flexible working not only for employees but for employers as well, citing reductions in turnover and sick leave. Mark Mortensen from INSEAD noted the complexities of measuring productivity in diverse roles. Several respondents described how remote work has drastically improved their productivity and career advancements, particularly individuals with neurodivergent conditions such as ADHD, like Rebecca, who reported a tripling of her salary since transitioning to remote work.

Despite the overwhelming support for remote work, not everyone shares this perspective. Some, like Hannah, expressed that prolonged remote working has adversely affected their mental and physical well-being, leading to feelings of isolation and prompting career reconsiderations. Overall, the debate underscores the ongoing shift in work culture spurred by the COVID-19 pandemic, illustrating a divide between those thriving in remote conditions and those struggling with the adjustments.